LASIK AND PRK
FACTS AND SECRETS REVEALED
TO THE EXCIMER LASER CANDIDATE
TSIOULIAS GEORGE MD,
PhD in Refractive Surgery
Fellowship in Cornea and Refractive Surgery (UCSD, USA)
Diplomat, European Boards of Ophthalmology (EBOD)
This book is only for informational purposes. It is not intended to be a substitute for medical or other professional advice, nor the author intends to give medical advice contrary to that of an attending physician. Its main goal is to trigger the refractive candidate finding straightforward must-ask questions to ask his Surgeon and help him understand aspects of this kind of surgery, which would better be revealed before, than after the procedure.
The information in the following pages does not replace your refractive surgeon but attempt to provide scientific knowledge in a practical and simple way. In that way your questions to the eye doctor are more accurate deserving also fully explained answers, which help you make a good well informed choice. This book only represents the author’s personal opinion and experience and is not to be regarded as personal or medical advice.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRK and LASIK is a practical simple guide to help you understand step-by- step excimer laser refractive correction. Get the opportunity and read this e-book that will accurately answer your questions about this kind of surgery. Find out the basics of LASIK and PRK. It will help you ask your physician or surgeon important and significant questions before undergoing the surgery. Your final decision will then be made based on a realistic understanding.
What you will learn…
Is everything clear about refractive surgery?
What questions should the refractive candidate ask?
What about the rest of the refractive procedures?
What should the refractive surgeon do?
For how long does the good result last?
Is excimer laser correction safe?
What should the patients keep in their mind?
Can presbyopia be corrected?
PRK or LASIK and when?
Introduction (Why and how this book has been written)
Is web given information confusing and sometimes misleading?
Excimer laser is a very popular surgical way to get rid of contacts or eyeglasses. It is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in the world today, involving otherwise healthy adults of almost every age between 18 and 68. Just type the word Lasik into any search engine and you will have immediately in front of your eyes innumerous links to web pages providing information about refractive surgery.
Refractive surgery candidates are healthy individuals with healthy eyes having nearsightedness or farsightedness with or without astigmatism.
Since Excimer laser refractive surgery is not only popular but also a profitable, commercially promoted, surgical procedure, it is extremely important to underline what the candidates should take under consideration before their final decision in a practical way.
This book answers the most frequently asked questions in a comprehensive and simple way.
A lot of refractive Candidates wonder why two or even three different eye surgeons have different approaches to the way they would choose to correct a certain refractive error. The Candidates are confused and they complain because they do not really know which approach would be the best for them. This book gives answers to the most important questions, trying to simplify the information and become a guide to help you understand and take the right decision.
For example in my opinion, when refractive surgery procedures are listed, Lasik and PRK should not be followed by phakic intraocular lens insertion as an easy to choose alternative. This creates the misleading impression to the candidates, that they can actually pick up the latter surgical procedure imagining that it has the same degree of acceptance and easiness as Lasik and PRK. This is no true… Lasik and PRK have nothing to do with phakic intraocular lens insertion or clear lens extraction… Lasik and PRK are widespread worldwide accepted laser techniques performed on the surface of the cornea, while phakic intraocular lens insertion or clear lens extracrion are intraocularly performed surgeries…we must take under consideration that refractive surgery candidates are healthy individuals with healthy eyes and usually younger than 50 years old.
Most of the web pages try to extensively cover all aspects of Excimer laser surgery in particular, and refractive surgery in general, in a way, that the candidate usually gets confused and misses the most important key points that affect their actual understanding of refractive surgery itself.
Let the cat out of the bag …(marketing secrets)
Is refractive surgery treated in reality as a commercially sold product?
Is information given in a complex manner?
Is the refractive surgery candidate a real patient?
Modern marketing strategy promotes aesthetic type surgical procedures like commercial products. This occasionally leads to an undesirable outcome, because a surgical procedure always has possible side effects. Excimer Laser Refractive surgery is not an actual cosmetic procedure but it carries characteristics of this kind of operations .
Doctors’ (often free) consultations, Commercials and other people experiences are the three most common ways to attract new patients in a doctor’s practice.
Modern market is based on complex rules with a main goal, the profit increase. Consultation quality depends on the doctor’s desire to convince the candidate to undergo the excimer laser procedure. Today’s trend is that information complexity wins over information simplicity. This occurs unintentionally (due to inability to simplify) or intentionally (because informative confusion may be a desirable marketing target).
First of all we have to keep in our mind and especially the candidates themselves that they are not really patients. They are healthy, they have healthy eyes although they wear contacts or eyeglasses and want to get rid of them.
Excimer laser candidate does not feel like being a patient and definitely does not want to become a real one ever!
Late haze after PRK
Making a long story short…
(refractive surgery in two words:PRK-LASIK)
Is excimer laser correction (PRK and LASIK ) the most frequently performed and important refractive surgery procedure?
At first refractive surgery used mainly incision techniques like radial and astigmatic keratotomy to achieve refractive correction through the alteration of the corneal shape. Real spreading of refractive surgery occurred after the appearance of Excimer laser.
Excimer laser refractive surgery is not new. It has been used for nearsightedness correction since 1980 and today modern laser machines corrective abilities have been extended to all the refractive spectrum including nearsightedness (myopia), and farsightedness (hyperopia) with or without astigmatism, demonstrating excellent results. Therefore incision techniques have been almost abandoned.
Today’s refractive surgery is well known because of Excimer laser. Actually today’s refractive surgery is and should be mainly considered as excimer laser refractive surgery. Other more surgical intraocular techniques found their way in the field of refractive surgery favored by Excimer laser correction, without deserving this to the extend that the Excimer laser does.
Lasik (Laser in situ Keratosmileusis )
PRK ( Photorefractive Kerarectomy)
Reference to other less common refractive surgery techniques creates confusion to the candidate.
PRK changes the shape of the anterior central corneal stroma by using excimer laser ablation at the front of the eye, just under the epithelial cells. These cells, which form the outer layer of the cornea, are mechanically removed prior to the ablation.
PRK: Similar procedures = TRANS- PRK, LASEK, EPI-LASIK
TRANS- PRK or Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy acts by using excimer laser at the front of the eye, for both epithelial cells removal and corneal stroma shape change.
Important: Not all excimer laser machines are good for TRANS- PRK
LASIK uses a microkeratome to create a corneal flap. The flap is lifted and then, the shape of central corneal stroma is changed by means of excimer laser ablation. The flap is subsequently returned into position.
LASIK (standard or Conventional): Similar procedures = femto lasik, custom Lasik.
Femto lasik uses femtosecond laser (femto lasik or intralasik) to create the corneal flap. The flap is lifted and then, the shape of central corneal stroma is changed by means of excimer laser ablation. The flap is subsequently returned into position.
Custom Lasik uses laser-ablation planned on the morphology of each individual eye. Custom lasik can be wavefront guided or topography guided and is rarely used when special refractive aberrations also need to be corrected, especially in retreatments.
TABLE 11.Radial keratotomy (RK) almost abandoned
2.Astigmatic keratotomies (AK) abandoned on healthy eyes
3.Intraocular lenses in healthy phakic eyes (ICLs, PIOL). Ask and search before accepting to undergo intraocular lens insertion in healthy eyes. Potential side effects occur even after a lot of years.
4.Clear lens extraction Ask and search before accepting to undergo clear lens extraction. It is an intraocular surgery and actually the same procedure as cataract extraction, performed for high myopia correction with retinal detachment risks.
5.Conductive keratotomy (CK) rarely used
6.ReLEx under clinical evaluation and not spread. A lenticule is cut with femtosecond laser within the corneal stroma. A LASIK-like flap is then cut which can be lifted to manually remove the lenticule with a blunt spatula and forceps.
7. Intracorneal rings (ICRs) abandoned on healthy eyes.
8. Procedures for presbyopia correction: multifocal Lasik, prebylasik, corneal inlays, multifocal intraocular lenses etc… under evaluation, in experimental phase or abandoned… Ask and search before accepting to undergo a procedure for presbyopic correction. It won’t correct presbyopia in the way you imagine. In reality it will create a monovision status where the dominant eye will be used for far vision and the non diminant for near vision. Not everybody’s brain accepts this mixture…
For the above reasons we will speak mainly about two procedures: PRK and LASIK.
PRK and Lasik are the most common and acceptable refractive surgery techniques performed on usually young patients’ healthy eyes today.
Almost all other refractive surgery techniques are less common, rarely performed or even still under clinical evaluation, in experimental phase or abandoned…
Let’s start asking questions…
Are all patients eligible for excimer laser refractive correction?
Is sometimes the best and safest solution not to DO ANYTHING AT ALL?
What is the optimal range of refractive errors that should be treated with excimer laser?
What factors determine if a candidate is suitable for excimer laser correction?
Remember also that only excimer laser correction is widely used in refractive surgery and this is not coincidental…
The reason why this kind of operation is so common among your friends and other people you know, is because it usually has an excellent outcome and at the same time its action involves only the surface of the eye and not the intraocular space…
Otherwise you could always choose among several other procedures like in a super market…but HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN TABLE 1 ?
Not all patients (candidades) are eligible for excimer laser refractive surgery. Refractive Surgery is not for all. Contraindications can be absolute or relative,
Absolute contraindications include:
Patients with keratoconus or irregular astigmatism, evolving cataract, younger age less than 17 years old, unstable refraction, one-eyed or amblyopic patients with BCVA less than 20/40, severe dry eyes, thin corneas or glaucoma.
Relative contraindications include:
Uncontrolled diabetes, uveitis or collagen disease, pregnancy, herpes zoster, perfectionism, psychic disease, treatment with isotretinoin or amiodarone etc.
All the above may appear fairly straightforward but as it usually happens that’s not the rule in everyday practice. After all, the borders between absolute and relative are not sharp but fuzzy …
Always remember that in difficult borderline cases the best and safest solution is not to DO ANYTHING AT ALL. You have not become an excimer laser patient yet…and you don’t want to become a real one …
If a patient has a very high myopia eg –14.00 D he is not a good excimer laser candidate. What most probably happens next, would be the physician’s suggestion for an an intraocular procedure…
Why should the candidate undergo a refractive procedure one way or the other? Can he be successfully corrected? The answer is maybe yes but at what cost? And with what short or long term risks? Yes he can undergo an intraocular procedure like ICL insertion if he is young or clear lens extraction if he is older than 50 years old. But intraocular procedures are performed as their name implies, intraocularly and in reality were not the main reason for refractive surgery success story, the excimer laser was…
Who are the best candidates for excimer laser surgery?
Laser eye surgery can of course correct near-sightedness, far-sightedness and astigmatism . but to a certain degree.
Best candidates should have a refractive error in the range:
|Myopes from –0.75 to –10.00 D with or without astigmatism
Hyperopes from +1.25 to +6.00 D with or without astigmatism
Higher myopes with more than 10.00 D of myopia tend to recur and also develop earlier in life refractive changes due to their physical lens age- related alterations. So their happiness does not last more than a few years…in addition corneal ectasia may appear after uneventful excimer laser surgery and its risk increases with the amount of the attempted myopia correction. Higher myopes experience also after excimer laser surgery, corneal curvature changes that decrease their optical quality of vision. High hyperopes with more than +6.00D of hyperopia also experience corneal curvature changes that decrease even more their visual optical quality …
The candidate should not be convinced. On the contrary his wishes for surgical correction must be carefully explored because behind strong wishes sometimes hide non-realistic expectations. The mixture of overstated promises with non- realistic expectations may turn out to be explosive…
The patient should be fully informed about the statistically expected refractive postoperative outcome, which is a function of the patient’s age, the kind and amount of the preoperative refractive error.
Patient selection should be in accordance with the accepted indications. Complications occur when surgeons operate on patients who are not appropriate candidates.
Refractive surgeon’s target is to exclude candidates with contraindications to undergo excimer laser correction and to perform the chosen refractive technique properly.
Preoperative best corrected vision (BCVA) is a very important factor influencing the decision whether or not refractive surgery should be performed.
For example if the patient’s best vision (BVCA) is less than 20/40 on the eye chart, then it is better for the candidate not to undergo excimer laser correction. Let’s assume that the candidate has in one or even worse in both eyes a refractive error –10.00 D of myopia and –2.00 D of astigmatism with BCVA 20/50, because his eyes are also lazy. Then after a perfect lasik procedure his BCVA would be again 20/50 with an assumed perfect plano (zero) refractive result. In reality this is theoretical because the patient most probably will definitely have an amount of residual postoperative refractive error, lets say –0.50D with astigmatism of –0.50D. This fine refractive outcome will reduce his postoperative vision to 20/70, with worse contrast sensitivity and optical quality, due to his highly myopic excimer ablation. When the patient will compare his preoperative vision with contacts to the postoperative one, he won’t be satisfied…
20/70 uncorrected vision leaves the patient dissatisfied.
Factors affecting results
Kind of refractive error
Level of preoperative best corrected vision (BCVA)
Presence of systemic or ocular pathology
Time to get the facts and …break the myths
Is excimer laser correction prettified as a procedure?
Is refraction actually stable?
What should the refractive surgeon do in order to achieve a long lasting outcome?
Should you wait at least until 30 to undergo excimer laser correction?
Is Excimer laser surgery a very easy procedure and not real surgery?
Is Excimer laser surgery a very dangerous , risky procedure?
Will glasses be needed again after excimer laser correction?
Do the patients fully realize during preoperative consultation the statistics of the refractive procedure itself?
Will 20 / 20 uncorrected Vision or even ‘super’ vision be achieved?
Does Technology play a significant role?
Are Patients after excimer laser correction able to wear contact lenses if needed again?
Do the candidates prefer LASIK or PRK?
Postoperative patient satisfaction is determined by a variety of factors, including the amount of the patient’s preoperative refraction, the initial BCVA and the patient’s expectations. Inaccurate information or promises may lead to a dissatisfied unhappy patient…
Patient’s accurate information, his knowledge and understanding of the facts as well as the myths, is the first important step for a successful excimer laser correction. This will lead to his correct final decision to undergo or not the procedure. He should then decide if he should undergo PRK or Lasik…Finally he has to understand that possible ocular pathology unrelated to excimer laser might statistically develope in the future.
I have performed some Web research regarding to the way excimer refractive laser surgery promoted by professionals…I realized that the willingness to be distinguished among the others competitors may easily cross some limits. So the outgoing picture for marketing reasons prettifies the whole process and does not accurately reflect the real world issues.
Be careful … this does not mean that excimer laser results are not good… the outcomes are exceptionally good, if and only if the appropriate guidelines are followed and if the refractive target remains within the proper indications …When the candidate hears strong words, such as an excellent super vision or 20/20 vision forever, then the surgeon is not conservative with what he promises and has as main goal to convince the patient to undergo the procedure…
Lets go back to the drawing board…
Refraction stability is required. Is my refraction stable?
Fact: Refraction stability is actually a myth…Refraction is not absolutely stable…why should it be? According to the Greek philosopher Heraclitus: ‘πάντα ρει’ … Translated it means that absolutely nothing remains stable…The same applies to refraction.
Approximately 74.000 patient records were analyzed to identify adults with -1.00 to -6.00 D of myopia who were followed for more than 20 years. The mean changes per myopic patient age decade were: 20s, -0.60 D; 30s, -0.39 D; 40s, -0.29 D; 1
The meaning of these findings is that from 20s to 40s the mean myopic shift in myopes reaches – 1.28 D! This increase is not huge but more than enough to turn a patient that has undergone excimer laser surgery, in the years to come, from happy to unhappy. In higher amounts of myopia the myopic shift tends to be even higher.
The term stable refraction is not correct. Furthermore in the early 50s the crystal lens age- related alterations create also myopic changes especially in moderate to high myopic eyes.
The guideline:”Your eyeglass prescription should be stable (less than +/-0.50 diopter change) for one year or more before proceeding with surgery” does not accurately show the actual refractive state trend for changes over time. Should we then forget all about refractive surgery and be happy with our glasses and contacts? The answer is again no. Because of one fact and one trick!
- A) The fact is that we all get older. That means that as we reach and pass 40s our accommodation weakens and presbyopic difficulties start.
So even if we had the refractive correction in the early 30s we are still happy with our result, because we can still maintain fairly enough good distance vision and at the same time the need for near vision glasses is delayed due to our myopic shift.
But what about when we had the surgery in the early 20s and after ten years we have again –0.50 D myopia or even worse if after an initial –0.50 D under correction by adding the myopic shift , we end with in –1.00 D? then we may become again very unhappy… still young myopes
- B) What’s the trick? It is very important that the younger myopes should be overcorrected by the excimer laser at least to the +0.50 level. After all most younger myopes have overcorrected eyeglasses because they themselves prefer to be overcorrected and see the things bolder…+0.50 overcorrection does not create other symptoms. From what I conclude from thousands of my patients undergone excimer laser surgery is that a plano initial refraction changes towards myopia within the first decade postoperatively. The eyes change over time, but in most cases the patients are happy because of the initial targeted overcorrection.
There are two possible causes of myopia increase after excimer laser correction:
1) Myopia regression: The results from LASIK slightly wear off over time. Mean myopic regression has found to be –0.50D 4 (myopia regression)
2) New myopia born: From 20s to 40s in myopes the mean myopic shift reaches 1.28 D .
| In order the patients to be happy in the following 10 to 15 years the refractive surgeon has to:
1) Calculate the desired refractive target by creating overcorrection , counting in both the mean age- related myopic shift and the mean myopic regression from the operation…
2) Perform a perfect operation
MYTH # 2
I should wait at least until 30 to undergo excimer laser correction.
Fact: the candidate should not wait too long for excimer laser surgery… Since we can use the trick of overcorrection in younger candidates, it is possible that teenagers seeking for professional education in military schools or athletes can undergo excimer laser correction earlier. If there is no other pressure, like the above activities, it is better to wait until the 21st year because at an earlier age myopia is statistically more possible to evolve. As we get older after 30 and approach early 40’s prebyopic changes start to reduce our ability to read and therefore the longer we wait the less time we have to feel free from glasses for both our far and near visual activities. So it is better not to wait too long for the decision.
On the other edge of the spectrum older candidates are not contraindicated to undergo excimer laser correction unless general or ophthalmic pathology prevents them from doing so…refractive target for patients in their 40’s , 50’s or even 60’s is to leave them slightly myopic ( about –0.50 D) or to create mono vision. In mono vision the dominant eye is corrected to plano, for far vision and the non dominant is being left with –1.25 to –1.50 D, for near vision. Prerequisite is that the above refractive state is accepted by the candidate.
MYTH # 3
Excimer laser surgery is a very easy procedure and not real surgery.
Fact: Lasik or PRK correction is definitely a surgical process. Risk for side effects always exist, as it is true for all surgical procedures. Even if excimer laser correction is a superficial and not intraocular intervention it is still being performed on healthy eyes of healthy individuals usually in the active phase of their lives. This creates the need of having accurate, reproducible outcomes and happy satisfied patients without eyeglasses or contacts.
MYTH # 4
Excimer laser surgery is a very dangerous and risky procedure.
Fact: Today a lot of published clinical studies involving a large number of patients have proven that the possibility of severe complications is extremely low and maybe lower than the risk of contact lens usage… Moderate glare and eye dryness are the most common side effects immediately following excimer laser surgery but are usually transient and typically last up to the third or sixth postoperative month. Modern excimer laser algorithms and aspheric ablation beam laser profiles actually reduce glare.
MYTH # 5
Excimer laser surgery creates permanently dry eyes.
Fact: As already mentioned before eye dryness in the vast majority of cases is transient and diminishing and there is no evidence that excimer laser leads to permanently dry eyes… lasik has a tendency to create a mild dryness because the corneal nerves are cut due to flap formation. Patients with insisting postoperative eye dryness actually had it before excimer laser correction .
MYTH # 6
After excimer laser correction, glasses will never be needed again.
Fact: The majority of patients (95% ) can achieve 20/20 uncorrected vision or within one to two lines of the 20/20 line on the eye chart. Such accuracy frees the patient’s dependence on glasses or contacts for everyday activities.
In reality, as already mentioned, refractive changes will occur with time and will lead to the need of a retreatment or a prescription again after a mean interval of 10 to 15 years…this means reading glasses again for presbyopia , a light pair of glasses for special only activities (eg driving, watching television) or return to the previous full time need for glasses an option which is the worse, psychologically speaking, outcome for these patients…
Retreatments are required in the third occasion but are not always feasible because :
|1) such a myopic retreatment in a presbyopic age would contradict the otherwise desired presbyopic decompensation
2) may not be possible because of operational technical difficulties (inadequate residual corneal thickness, inability to lift the flap etc)
3) or simply because of the patient’s unwillingness to undergo again a second surgery.
From my experience the patient’s denial is the most common reason.
MYTH # 7
The patients fully realize during preoperative consultation the statistics of the refractive procedure itself (accuracy, risks).
Fact: Actually they do not… When I consult the Candidates I realize that the only thing they understand as risk due to procedure ‘failure’ is the possibility to wear glasses again…
a) Never want to wear glasses again and never want to undergo retreatment again.
b) Since they are healthy they do not really understand the possibility of risks.
We can subdivide the procedure failure into four categories:
1) Missed refractive target (significant undercorrection or overcorrection).
2) Future change due to regression or refractive change with time.
3) Complication that can be reversed ( prolonged healing, eye dryness, night glare) Moderate night glare and dry eyes are common side effects immediately following excimer laser correction , but are transient and usually last just up to third or rarely sixth postoperative month.
4) ‘Bad ’ complications that would lead to permanently reduced vision ( irregular astigmatism creation due to haze formation , flap complications, ectasia or severe infection with corneal tissue destruction) . the risk for such complications is extremely low though. The researchers calculated the risk of significant vision loss consequence of LASIK surgery to be closer to 1-in-10.000
MYTH # 8
The patients fully realize during preoperative consultation the statistics of possible future ocular pathology development unrelated to excimer laser surgery.
Fact: Actually they do not.
- a) It is hard for them to understand that their myopic eye structure predisposes them , statistically speaking, to future pathology like glaucoma, retinal detachment or even early ‘myopic’ cataract formation. The patients believe that ‘myopia’ has been fixed with all its related problems.
- b) They do not realize that other pathological conditions totally irrelevant to their myopic structure may also be developed like central serous chorioretinopathy or other fundus diseases)
If anything pathologic occurs then the usual suspect is the excimer laser correction itself…even after 15 years… Because at the time of excimer laser procedure the eyes were healthy…
MYTH # 9
I will have 20 / 20 uncorrected Vision or even ‘super’ vision.
Fact: This is 95% sure and for a long but finite interval time ( as mentioned before).
Higher myopes are less probable to achieve 20/20 vision because the amount of corneal ablation required to correct their refractive error affects the possibility to achieve 20/20 vision postoperatively. Most patients requiring extensive corneal ablation, result in a significant improvement in their visual aquity, but are less likely to have 20/20 vision after LASIK in comparison to “patients “ with lower refractive errors.
Postoperative satisfaction is determined by a variety of factors, including:
1) amount of the patient’s preoperative refraction,
2) initial BCVA and
3) patient’s expectations.
Fact: ‘Super’ vision of course does not exist. What actually exists is a postoperative vision better than the one with glasses or contacts before laser correction, which occurs in 32% of the cases for a unspecified finite period of time.
This happens if the refractive procedure has been perfectly performed, by using ‘state of the art’ techniques, after careful selection of the candidates. This nice result is dynamically being changed with time though, because the optical system of the eye changes as well as the patients themselves notice.
Customized techniques like wavefront or topography guided Lasik had been used in the past promising ‘Super’ vision.
Today they are used only in a few cases especially in retreatments, because no significant advantage has been found comparing to standard Lasik using modern wavefront optimized ablation profiles.
MYTH # 10
Technology does not matter.
Fact: Technology matters. Newer excimer laser units with advanced algorithms produce better results. In addition, modern lasers can correctly register eye position in 3 dimensions and track the eye in all the possible directions of eye movement.
Furthermore I have to underline that not all lasers are capable to perform certain techniques like transepithelial PRK. There are a number of laser options available that can be used to treat a patient’s refractive error. After proper and thorough evaluation, the refractive surgeon can choose the most appropriate method of correction and laser unit needed. Surgeons who have access to a wide variety of laser options, ensure that their patients are treated with the type of laser best suited for their refractive problem.
Time to get the facts and …break the myths
Should women have no further births in their mind before undergoing excimer laser surgery?
Should women women give their child caesarian and not natural birth after excimer laser correction?
Will you develop retinal detachment?
Should you forget your regular eye exam after excimer laser procedure?
What information of their preoperative eye history should the patients keep in their files?
Can Presbyopia be corrected?
MYTH # 11
Women must have no further births in their mind before undergoing excimer laser correction because their myopia will increase in case of pregnancy.
Fact: Statistical possibility for myopia increase is a function of two factors. The age and the degree of myopia. The younger the age and the higher the myopia the more possible is that myopia will increase Small levels of myopic shift during pregnancy has actually been reported due to hormonal changes but after delivery myopia returns usually to pre pregnancy levels.
MYTH # 12
After excimer laser correction women should give their child caesarian and not natural birth , because of retinal detachment risk.
Fact: Obviously excimer laser has nothing to do with retinal detachment risk, but the presence of untreated peripheral myopic degenerations like retinal tears in a myopic fundus has.
Furthermore vaginal delivery is nearly always possible. Caesarean section is not usually required due to myopia , peripheral retinal lattice , after retinal surgery or after retinal tear laser treatment, irrespectively to excimer laser surgery . Mother’s Funduscopy is recommended though after child’s birth.2
MYTH # 13
Patients after excimer laser correction can not wear contact lenses if needed due to myopia regression or new myopia development.
Fact: There is usually no problem wearing soft contact lenses even after high myopic corrections. Some patients actually wear plano color-changing contacts for cosmetic reasons only. Specially designed reverse topography or hard contact lenses are rarely necessary.
MYTH # 14
The candidates prefer LASIK.
Fact: Unaffected candidates actually prefer PRK. It mainly depends on how the doctor describes the procedure process during consultation and on candidate’s web research.
MYTH # 15
Retinal detachment risc.
Fact: Excimer laser correction and especially Lasik is not considered to be an independent risk factor for retinal detachment creation…on the other hand myopia is a well-known risk factor for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and contributes more to the development of RD in myopic patients after refractive surgery, rather than refractive surgery itself.
Only prospective studies can determine whether the procedure exacerbates myopic pathology. As a matter of fact Vitreoretinal complications after LASIK are very rare, and a cause-effect relationship between LASIK and reported posterior segment complications has not been proven. In cases of retinal detachment this could have occurred one way or the other irrespectively of the excimer laser surgery because the patient was myopic2
MYTH # 16
After excimer laser mission accomplished… I forget my regular eye exam.
Fact: Ocular pathology may develop irrespectively of excimer laser surgery…the patients should not forget that were myopes before surgery and they will still be myopes in eye structure after the surgery. The excimer laser has acted only like a curvature change on the front corneal surface to remove myopia in a refractively speaking way. That’s what the patients don’t realize. Myopic structure is the actual risk factor for developing future pathology like RD, glaucoma or early myopic cataracts.
Fact: the patients should keep in their files important information of their preoperative eye history…
Preoperative keratometry, Preoperative Refraction
Postoperative keratometry, Postoperative Refraction
Ophthalmologic history will be very useful for intraocular lens measurement after a lot of years when age related cataract evolves and cataract extraction will be needed.
MYTH # 17
Presbyopia can be corrected.
Fact: Refractive candidates should understand that presbyopia can not be corrected . If they have myopia and undergo excimer laser correction the time will come when reading glasses will be needed…This is especially true for prepresbiopic low myopes in the late 30’s 0r early 40’s who after excimer laser will definitely be dissatisfied. High myopes feel satisfied because of the fact that their high myopia made them dysfunctional and they don’t mind using glasses to read.
Presbyopia surgical correction is the next target of refractive surgery. Active accommodation cannot be restored because of the ageing process. Procedures inducing pseudoaccommodation through monovision, corneal multifocality, corneal inlays or intraocular surgery with multifocal intraocular lens insertion are used. Everybody wishes that anatomical difficulties would be overcome and that surgical correction of presbyopia would become a reality some day. For the time being, monovision alone on the non dominant eye is the most accepted approach ,provided that the patient’s brain accepts it. Multifocal Intraocular lenses have drawbacks. The other methods are still under clinical or experimental evaluation. Presbyopia is a fact of life. Even if a plethora of different methods exists they have not yet been widely accepted. We need, of course, to be open- minded and skeptical at the same time.
Best of both worlds …PRK OR LASIK?
PRK or LASIK?
After a little web research everybody easily notices the Lasik dominates. PRK is the poor relative. A closer and more objective look demonstrates PRK unique advantages in comparison to Lasik!
So we deserve to give PRK the benefit of the doubt.
Is an excellent technique less promoted in the internet, but with slower visual recovery when compared to Lasik and sometimes with prolonged healing phase, which may worry the patients.
This is the reason why PRK needs closer follow up than LASIK and doctor’s knowledge of the corneal healing.
PRK needs the patient’s compliance during the healing period.
PRK is less invasive and more superficial tecnique and therefore safer because a corneal flap is not cut.
It has the same excellent results like Lasik for myopia up to –7.00 D and for astigmatism up to 1.75 D (in this range belongs the majority of the patients).
it is easier to perform compared to Lasik (it needs less operation).
It is cheaper.
PRK creates less dryness in the long term, because corneal nerves are disturbed only superficially (very important especially in women after 40’s when more often ocular dryness is anticipated)
Patients accept it more easily because they do not feel afraid when they hear the description of the whole process.
It is easier performed on stressed, non cooperative patients with great fears.
It is easier performed on patients with difficult orbital anatomy or narrow interpalpebral fissure.
PRK is the preferred technique on young patients, athletes, military personnel, policemen, factory workers exposed to increased danger for hitting their eyes when compared to Lasik because of the absence of the corneal flap.
PRK is the preferred technique in cases with keratoconus suspect corneal topography.
PRK is the preferred technique in cases with thin corneas due to less statistical corneal ectasia risk.
PRK is the preferred technique induces less corneal aberrations due to the absence of corneal flap formation.
Haze formation is the only significant complication Now it is rare because of better mashines, better ablation profiles, mitomycin- C use, and trans PRK
Lasik is an excellent technique promoted stronger than PRK in the internet and its main advantage is rapid visual recovery.
Lasik creates better refractive outcome than PRK in myopias higher than –7.00D and astigmatism higher than –1.75 D (in this range belongs the minority of the patients).
Hyperopia , hyperopic astigmatism and mixed astigmatism correction should always be performed also with LASIK.
It needs no prolonged usage of cortisone eye drops.
Lasik is useful to patients unable to instill eye drops or afraid of the possibility of prolonged healing.
It is convenient for both the patient and the doctor for different reasons.
For the patient because of the rapid recovery.
For the doctor because its follow up is easier than that of PRK.
DLK, ectasia, flap wrinkles and other flap complications, epithelial ingrowth are rare side effects but if they occurred, we would have preferred PRK…
LASIK Is a more surgical technique.
Even uneventful Lasik performed with the most advanced technology induces higher order aberrations because of flap creation…and the truth is that flap Microwrinkles may be visible after even after a perfect Lasik , in the best experienced hands.
A sneaky ugly complication called ectasia is a condition where the cornea starts to bulge forwards after LASIK, causing irregular astigmatism. The condition is similar to keratoconus. Even if all indications are strictly followed, ectasia may occur. We do not know the exact pathophysiology and its mechanisms. And therefore we cannot fully protect from ectasia. The worse is that Pregnancy may trigger late onset of tectasia after LASIK! Ectasia may appear also after PRK but at extremely low rates.
|Lasik is to be chosen only if the kind or amount of the refractive error demands it for the shake of the outcome. Lasik should not be chosen for reasons of impression or convenience in the refractive range where both techniques yield the same outcome !|
Complications (the BAD, the GOOD and the UGLY)
What are the good (reversible), the bad (permanent) or the ugly (sneaky) side effects of excimer laser correction?
The possibility of severe complications is extremely low.
1) ‘Good’ (transient) complications are side effects that can be reversed (prolonged healing, eye dryness, night glare, mild corneal haze)
Moderate night glare , dry eyes and mild corneal haze are side effects following excimer laser correction, but are transient and usually last up to the 3d or rarely the 12th postoperative month.
2) Bad complications are irreversible side effects that lead to permanently reduced vision ( irregular astigmatism due to corneal ectasia, severe haze formation , irreversible flap complications or severe infection with corneal tissue destruction).
Common denominator of all excimer laser complications is the creation of irregular astigmatism which is perceived by the patient as visual loss (central irregular astigmatism) in the worse scenario or as night vision deterioration in milder cases (peripheral irregular astigmatism).
The best way to face the above complications is to avoid them by performing “a state of the art” operation after proper patient selection and by following them up closely.
In the actual case of a complication, prognosis is a function of the kind and severity of the complication.
Ugly complications are hard to treat with ectasia being the worst complication of them all (mainly a Lasik side effect). Corneal ectasia is a complication that is estimated to occur following 1 in 5000 or less of LASIK procedures. It may result in increasing myopia and astigmatism, loss of visual acuity, steepening of the corneal curvature, and topographic asymmetric steepening of the inferior corneal curvature.Irregular topography after Lasik.
All the questions that you should ask your refractive surgeon
What does the FDA website on LASIK state?
«Before undergoing a refractive procedure, you should carefully weigh the risks and benefits based on your own personal value system, and try to avoid being influenced by friends that have had the procedure or doctors encouraging you to do so.»
It is obvious that these procedures are very commercial .
Is everything clear about refractive surgery?
A lot of refractive Candidates wonder why two or even three different eye surgeons have different approaches to the way they choose to correct a certain refractive error… The Candidates are then confused and they complain because they do not really know which approach would be the best for them.
For example, when refractive surgery procedures are listed, Lasik and PRK should not be followed by phakic intraocular lens insertion, clear lens extraction or corneal inlays as an easy to choose alternative …This creates the misleading impression to the candidates, that they can actually pick up a more surgical procedure with the same degree of acceptance and easiness as Lasik or PRK.
It must not be forgotten that refractive surgery candidates are healthy individuals with healthy eyes and usually younger than 50 years old. Modern marketing promotes cosmetic type surgical procedures like commercial products.
Excimer laser candidates have the wish to get rid of their glasses in their minds and therefore are willing to undergo the procedure, although deep inside they do not feel like patients and definitely do not want to become a real one ever!
What should the refractive candidate not forget?
Today refractive surgery is well known because of Excimer laser.
Actually Today’s refractive surgery is and should be mainly excimer laser correction. Almost all other refractive surgery techniques are more surgical interventions, less commonly performed or even still under evaluation, in experimental phase or abandoned…
It is very important to understand that the moment the candidates express their wish to correct their refractive error they also trigger the doctor’s plans to perform some kind of refractive surgery on them.
Always the candidates should remember that in case of difficult borderline refractive cases the best and safest solution is not to DO ANYTHING AT ALL. You have not become an excimer laser patient yet…and you don’t want to become a real one .
What about the rest of the refractive procedures?
The other refractive procedures were not the main reason for refractive surgery success story, the excimer laser was.
What should the refractive surgeon do?
The candidates should not be convinced. The patient should be fully informed about the statistically expected refractive postoperative outcome, which is a function of the patient’s age, the kind and amount of the preoperative refractive error. Postoperative patient satisfaction is determined by a variety of factors, including the amount of the patients’s preoperative refraction, the initial BCVA and the patients’s expectations. Inaccurate information or pretified promises may lead to a dissatisfied unhappy patient.
Is refraction stable?
Refraction stability is actually a myth. From 20s to 40s the mean myopic shift in myopes reaches – 1.28 D! This increase is not huge but more than enough to turn a patient that has undergone excimer laser surgery, in the years to come, from happy to unhappy. It is therefore very important that the younger myopes should be overcorrected by the excimer laser …
For how long does the good outcome last?
For 10 to 15 years. In reality refractive changes will occur with time and will lead to the need of a retreatment or a prescription again after a mean interval of 10 to 15 years…
Is excimer laser correction safe?
The possibility of severe complications is extremely low. Complications occur when surgeons operate on patients who are not appropriate candidates. Excimer laser results are exceptionally good, if and only if the guidelines are followed and if the refractive target remains within the proper indications …The truth is though that one very sneaky complication exists. It is late onset corneal ectasia which occurs after Lasik in patients with no preoperative findings of any pathology and may appear years after the surgery especially in women during pregnancy. It is a rare Lasik side effect which occurs at some point in the future while the patient has forgotten that he had undergone excimer laser Lasik correction.
What about the patients?
They never want to wear glasses again and they never want to undergo retreatment again… Because since they are healthy they cannot really understand the possibility of risks. Actually the patients do not fully realize, during preoperative consultation, the statistics of possible future ocular pathology development unrelated to excimer laser surgery. If anything pathologic occurs then the usual suspect is the excimer laser correction itself…even after 15 years… because at the time of excimer laser procedure they were healthy…
What should the patient do afterwards?
The patients should keep important information of their preoperative eye history in their files. They should also undergo the proper eye exams regularly. Ocular pathology may develop irrespectively of excimer laser surgery. The patients should not forget that they were myopes before surgery and they will still be myopes in eye structure after the surgery.
Can presbyopia be corrected?
Refractive candidates should understand that presbyopia cannot be corrected . I do not understand why ophthalmologists wordwide insist on believing that they can actually correct presbyopia and strongly promote this fault belief?
Is PRK the poor relevant of LASIK?
Photorefractive keratectomy is presented in the internet pages as a second class excimer laser procedure when compared to Lasik…
PRK or LASIK?
It is very important for the candidate to decide whether he wishes to undergo PRK or Lasik…The fact is that unaffected from the internet pages or from commercial promotion, candidates actually prefer PRK. A closer and more objective look demonstrates PRK unique advantages in comparison to Lasik!
PRK is an excellent technique, with slower visual recovery when compared to Lasik and sometimes with prolonged healing phase which may worry the patients…this is the reason why PRK needs closer follow up than LASIK and doctor’s knowledge of the corneal healing. It also needs a patient’s compliance.
Lasik is an excellent technique promoted in the internet with rapid visual recovery but it is more invasive than PRK.
Even uneventful Lasik, performed with the most advanced technology, induces higher order aberrations because of flap creation…and the truth is that flap microwrinkles may be visible even after a perfect Lasik , in the best experienced hands…
Lasik should not be chosen for reasons of impression or convenience in the refractive range, where both techniques yield the same outcome.
|In the rare case of complication, doctor and candidate wish they had chosen PRK!
Lasik is to be chosen, if the kind or amount of refractive error demands it for the shake of the outcome.
More questions …
Am I eligible for excimer laser refractive correction?
Your physician should ensure you that you are not contraindicated to undergo excimer laser correction.
Do I belong to the optimal range of refractive errors that should be treated with excimer laser?
Your physician should ensure you that your refractive problem can be successfully corrected and inform you not only about your statistically expected refractive postoperative outcome but also about its expected future change.
Is it better for me not to DO ANYTHING AT ALL?
If your physician is trying to find a refractive technique other than Lasik or PRK to perform on you for the correction of your refractive problem, you should be careful …That would mean that you have a difficult kind of refraction with bad statistics for success…
What is your physician’s strategy to achieve a long lasting refractive outcome?
Your physician should have the proper refractive strategy in his mind so that your chances of achieving your freedom from eyeglasses would last for at least 10 to 15 years.
What are the dangers, risks and possible complications?
Your physician should explain to you, without the fear to lose you as a patient, all the possible dangers, risks and complications of the chosen refractive technique.
Does Technology matter?
Your physician should have access to a wide variety of laser options to ensure that you are going to be treated with the type of laser best suited for your refractive problem.
PRK or LASIK? And why?
Your physician should thoroughly explain to you in a simple, clear and convincing way the reasons for choosing the one or the other technique.
Physician’s answers to questions creating negative impression…
Is my refraction actually stable?
If the physician answers with a simple “yes”…and does not explain the statistics for your special kind of refractive problem then start to search with more caution…
Is everything going to be absolutely fine, shall I throw away my eyeglasses and contacts?
When the candidate hears strong words, such as an excellent super vision or 20/20 vision forever without further analysis and explanations, then the surgeon is not conservative with what he promises and has as main goal to convince the patient to undergo the procedure…
Is Excimer laser surgery a very easy procedure and not real surgery?
If the physician answers with a simple “yes”…and does not explain the statistics of possible side effects for your special kind of refractive problem then start to search with more caution…
Should I wait to undergo excimer laser correction later?
If the physician answers with a simple “no”…he is in a hurry to operate on you …There are cases where we should actually wait and other occasions where if we wait… we just lose time…
Questions for the Patient
Do you fully realize the statistics of the refractive procedure performed on you for your special kind and amount of refractive error?
With what risks? With what accuracy of refractive result? For how long this result will last?
Will you ever forget your regular eye exam after excimer laser procedure?
Lynn MJ. *J Refract Surg 1997;13:223-228
4) Regression and its mechanisms after laser in situ keratomileusis in moderate and high myopia. A. Chayet, K. Assil, M. Montes, M. Espinosa, A. Castellanos, G. Tsioulias. Ophthalmology, 1998;105:1194-1199.
5) Pregnancy may trigger late onset of keratectasia after LASIK.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jul;34(7):1219-21
7) «Corneal topography.Present and future.
DROUTSAS D., MILTSAKAKIS D., TSIOULIAS G., KLYCE S.Greek Annals of Ophthalmology,1993
8) «US FDA/CDRH: LASIK – What are the risks and how can I find the right doctor for me?». Fda.gov. 2008-11-11. Retrieved 2011-12-10
9) Barbara R, Abdelaziz L, Pikkel J, Barua A, Garzozi H, Barbara A. Late Onset Post-Lasik Ectasia. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2012;1(3):190-195.
10) Karmel, Miriam; The Thick and Thin of Ectasia; EyeNet Magazine 2008.
11)Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:93-8. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S38959. Epub 2013 Jan 10.